In brief
The report reveals that UVU did not conduct a written security assessment or prepare an event action plan, leaving key decisions to the attendee’s organizer. Campus officials had flagged risks of a courtyard surrounded by tall buildings, yet the venue was chosen anyway. Coordination between university police and the activist’s private security was weak, and no joint briefing took place. While no staff acted in bad faith, the lack of procedures such as drone surveillance and bag checks pushed the event to a fatal outcome. UVU’s president vows to act on the recommendations.
What went wrong? The review shows UVU fell short on all fronts. The campus did not do a written security assessment or produce an event action plan. Decision‑making was pushed to Turning Point USA, the activist’s group.
Campus police had warned that the courtyard surrounded by tall buildings was a risk. Even so, the venue was chosen because a Turning Point representative felt familiar with it.
There was no line‑of‑sight assessment, no joint police‑security briefing, and no drone or bag‑check screening – it was the bare minimum now expected at high‑profile events.
Responsibility – An apology was issued, and UVU president Jon Anderson said the university would "learn from these findings". The family’s lawyer, Brett Parkinson, said the report should lead to true accountability.
Georgia to review the recommended security changes. It’s a lesson in how weak prep can turn an audience into a tragedy.
